1951 Triumph Mayflower vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 20 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Triumph Mayflower | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Triumph | Volkswagen |
| Model | Mayflower | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1247 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2430 mm |
