1951 Triumph Renown vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 91 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Triumph Renown | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Triumph | Ford |
| Model | Renown | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2648 mm |
