1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1950 Austin A 40
To start off, 1952 Abarth 1500 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 40 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1950 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1500 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2360 mm |