1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1953 Jaguar C-Type is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 145 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1500 | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2450 mm |
