1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1960 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1960 Toyota Corona is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Corona. (29 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Corona weights approximately 90 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1960 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1500 | Corona |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2410 mm |