1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1963 Simca 1000
To start off, 1963 Simca 1000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Abarth 1500 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1963 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 1963 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Simca |
| Model | 1500 | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 943 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2230 mm |
