1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1964 Toyota Corona is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Corona (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Corona weights approximately 100 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1500 | Corona |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 77.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |