1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1969 Lotus Elan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Abarth 1500 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 1500 | Elan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2440 mm |