1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Abarth 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4690 mm |