1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1990 Volvo 780
To start off, 1990 Volvo 780 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 780 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 780 (200 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 780 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 1990 Volvo 780 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | 1500 | 780 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 80 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 213 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2780 mm |
