1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 105 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1500 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 83.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1400 mm |