1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan CQ-X is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan CQ-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Abarth 1500 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan CQ-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 1952 Abarth 1500 has manual transmission. 1952 Abarth 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1500 | CQ-X |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |