1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 645 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 2979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3030 mm |
