1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Abarth | Proton |
Model | 1500 | 400 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |