1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 1998 Alfa Romeo Dardo | |
| Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 1500 | Dardo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 68.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |
