1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2000 Citroen C 15
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2000 Citroen C 15 | |
| Make | Abarth | Citroen |
| Model | 1500 | C 15 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1761 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 23.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2750 mm |
