1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Abarth 1500 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | 1500 | M250 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2520 mm |
