1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2000 Mazda 121
To start off, 2000 Mazda 121 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 121 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2000 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 1500 | 121 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2460 mm |
