1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am weights approximately 477 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2000 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Abarth | Pontiac |
| Model | 1500 | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2570 mm |
