1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 420 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Abarth 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1500 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2810 mm |