1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 472 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 380 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Abarth | Pagani |
| Model | 1500 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 547 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2730 mm |
