1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 165 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1500 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |