1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 882 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1500 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2730 mm |
