1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Abarth 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3010 mm |