1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | 5 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |