1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Abarth 1500 (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Abarth 1500 should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Abarth | Peugeot |
| Model | 1500 | 207 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2320 mm |
