1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 332 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Abarth 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Abarth 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | 3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2650 mm |