1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Abarth 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Abarth 1500 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2710 mm |