1952 Abarth 1500 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Abarth 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Abarth 1500 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1952 Abarth 1500. (75 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1952 Abarth 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 516 kg more than 1952 Abarth 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Abarth 1500 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | 1500 | Evora |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2575 mm |
