1952 AC 2-Litre vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1952 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1952 AC 2-Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1952 AC 2-Litre has manual transmission. 1952 AC 2-Litre will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 AC 2-Litre | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | 2-Litre | Croma |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1798 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 130 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
