1952 AC 2-Litre vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1952 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 1952 AC 2-Litre.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 AC 2-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 AC 2-Litre. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 AC 2-Litre. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 1952 AC 2-Litre has manual transmission. 1952 AC 2-Litre will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 AC 2-Litre | 2006 Opel Antara | |
Make | AC | Opel |
Model | 2-Litre | Antara |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |