1952 AC 2-Litre vs. 2008 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1952 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 AC 2-Litre weights approximately 213 kg more than 2008 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 AC 2-Litre. (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 AC 2-Litre.

Compare all specifications:

1952 AC 2-Litre 2008 Ford Mustang
Make AC Ford
Model 2-Litre Mustang
Year Released 1952 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 76 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 137 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 1107 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1560 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2980 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 61 L