1952 AC 2-Litre vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 AC 2-Litre would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Volt weights approximately 395 kg more than 1952 AC 2-Litre.
Because 1952 AC 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 AC 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 AC 2-Litre | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2-Litre | Volt |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 35 L |
