1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1948 Simca 8
To start off, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1948 Simca 8. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 450 kg more than 1948 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1948 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Simca |
| Model | 6C | 8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |
