1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1963 Ferrari 250 LM
To start off, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,286 cc (12 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 250 LM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM (317 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 550 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1963 Ferrari 250 LM | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari |
Model | 6C | 250 LM |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 58.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |