1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1966 Ford GT 40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 264 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2420 mm |