1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1973 ZIL 114
To start off, 1973 ZIL 114 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1780 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1973 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | ZIL |
Model | 6C | 114 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 3180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3770 mm |