1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1983 Audi 4000
To start off, 1983 Audi 4000 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 4000.
Because 1983 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1983 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
Model | 6C | 4000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |