1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1984 Toyota Blizzard
To start off, 1984 Toyota Blizzard is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Blizzard is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1984 Toyota Blizzard. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota Blizzard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Blizzard weights approximately 20 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1984 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1984 Toyota Blizzard | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | Blizzard |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |