1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1990 Audi 90
To start off, 1990 Audi 90 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 90 (130 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 266 kg more than 1990 Audi 90.
Because 1990 Audi 90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1990 Audi 90 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | 90 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |
