1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1991 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet SS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet SS (245 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1991 Chevrolet SS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | SS |
Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 245 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3000 mm |