1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 86 kg more than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1314 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |