1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1995 BMW Dinan
To start off, 1995 BMW Dinan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Dinan (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Dinan should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW Dinan weights approximately 325 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1995 BMW Dinan | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 6C | Dinan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 326 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |