1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1995 Buick XP2000
To start off, 1995 Buick XP2000 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Buick XP2000 has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Buick XP2000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1995 Buick XP2000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | 6C | XP2000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 243 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |