1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 124 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Camaro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |