1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 198 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Triax |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 660 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2790 mm |