1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (113 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 230 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | Neon |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |