1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 174 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.

Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Alfa Romeo 6C 2000 Mercury Sable
Make Alfa Romeo Mercury
Model 6C Sable
Year Released 1952 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 3001 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 0 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1574 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2760 mm