1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 390 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3010 mm |
