1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 5 kg more than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 6C | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 98.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |